4/7InkzHVUEQeEdU9vpc1tikzEhChrKmPfvXI-FSDBrBQ

January 2012

Comments in Social Media vs Contact Information

2×2 is an experimental site in a fairly new medium, so we are learning along with everyone else. A recent real life lesson is teaching us the difference between “comments” as a way to interact vs actually posting contact information.

2×2 was launched in February of 2011. It is built on a blogging platform, so comments have always been possible. We had not included obvious phone numbers or emails. We thought the comment mechanism was the way interested people would reach us.

Our overall goal is to create helpful dialog on issues which affect small church ministry but are not often discussed. How that happens is up to our readers! While we have always invited comments, “getting comments” has never been a goal as it is among many bloggers.

We have followed analytics on our site since about June and we knew that we were getting many international “hits.” We had no way to measure whether or not they were quality hits or accidental surfing hits.

About a week ago, a reader wrote to us via a comment asking for contact information. We immediately responded by posting a contact name and number in the sidebar. We have been in regular communication since. We have begun to hear from others as well — not on the site — but via email and telephone.

Our emails are proving that we do, indeed, have a national and international following that is beginning to put us in direct contact with ministries we would have never known about years ago.

This morning we had a detailed email from a ministry in Pakistan, thanking us for our web site. The pastor sent us links to their ministry site and asked for our prayers.

Was it coincidence that a 2×2/Redeemer member suggested last week that the 2×2 web site begin to include a prayer list? Probably not.

2×2 is a place for sharing about ministry and we will always be glad to feature ministry news that will benefit the labors of other small Christian communities. We will consider linking to any ministry that sends us information to verify their ministry efforts.

And, of course, we will add your ministry to our soon to be published prayer list.

Lesson to be learned: Comments are nice, but communication is better!

The Future Belongs to the Underdogs and Innovators

This headline is a quote from a post in the Marketing Agency Insider. The post discusses how traditional marketing firms are doomed if they don’t learn to adapt to the new world and offer a hybrid approach to helping companies reach new people with their products and services.

The article’s advice and analysis may be applied to the emerging church and its outreach efforts.

Things happen slowly in the church. Church structure is designed that way. Stability and normalcy are rewarded. Innovation is something to applaud and forget. It seems like every promising innovation is derailed by reverting to the old ways — the structure. Successful churches are those that are still doing things the same way with membership that can still support the old way, even if both membership and offerings are in steady, long-term decline.

Applauding survival has created a crisis among mainline religions that has been growing unchecked for decades. Still, church leaders talk about change but implement very little.

The article we quoted talks about five things that will cause a major shift in the way things are being done in the marketing world. Each can be applied to church and mission.

  1. The emerging church will find alternative funding streams. They will no longer rely on the offering plate as the sole support for mission.
  2. The emerging church must integrate its services and use every technology available.
  3. The emerging church must concentrate on efficiency in delivering services and that includes creating new, cost-effective leadership structures.
  4. The emerging church must find ways to lower operating costs. We cannot continue to support budgets that are top-heavy in management and real estate with very little money left for mission, education and service.
  5. The emerging church will find new ways to measure its successes and be accountable for its mission dollars.

The article concludes that it is the risk takers who are going to emerge from current turmoil. It concludes (slightly paraphrased to apply to “church”) that a new prominence will be afforded to the risk takers who fight to remain nimble, always thinking like startups and acting like underdogs. Their presence will be a disruptive force for years to come, shifting the balance of power and raising the bar for what’s possible when seeking new partnerships in mission.

2×2 has been saying all of this for a while!

Denominations should be concentrating on helping every congregation tool up for change that bears these five points in mind. Instead, congregations hear about “drafting mission statements” and “stewardship” and preparing to “call a pastor” and maintaining existing church budgets — which have the status quo as their foundation.

2×2 Will Help Congregations Generate Content Ideas for Blogs

2×2 with its interest in the Church and Social Media has been pondering content creation for congregations.

We recognize it is a challenge especially for small congregations. How can you find something worth writing about two or three times per week?

Sharing content is one method of filling your blog, but if every church did this, all church blogs would be the same and there would be little advantage. You can always share content from 2×2 (just give us credit and link).

However, there MUST be something unique about your congregation’s web presence. Someone in your church is going to have to develop content or find people willing to contribute to your congregation’s blog. Sounds like a big job.

We have an idea that may help.

Beginning this coming Friday, once a month, 2×2 will publish monthly content ideas. We’ll start with February. The list will give your congregation and its Social Media Committee some idea starters. You can take it from there!

We hope 2×2’s monthly list of content ideas will be seeds for you to develop you own content and voice and internet outreach ministry.

Now we’ll get back to work. Hmmm. February. Where do we start?

Thoughts from Martin Luther King, Jr.

photo credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lel4nd/4256488240/">Lel4nd</a> via <a href="http://photopin.com">photopin</a> <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">cc</a>Dr. King, as he is always addressed in Philadelphia . . .  never just “King,” had some thoughts that are being shared on the internet today.

His words still honor him and motivate us. They speak loudly to the people of 2×2 and Redeemer in the East Falls neighborhood of Philadelphia, who have experienced injustice, greed, materialism and modern-day racism at the hands of our denominational leaders.

We must rapidly begin the shift from a “thing-oriented” society to a “person-oriented” society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered.

Change does not roll in on the wheels of inevitability, but comes through continuous struggle. And so we must straighten our backs and work for our freedom. A man can’t ride you unless your back is bent.

On some positions, Cowardice asks the question, “Is it safe?” Expediency asks the question, “Is it politic?” And Vanity comes along and asks the question, “Is it popular?” But Conscience asks the question “Is it right?” And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but he must do it because Conscience tells him it is right.

 The saving of our world from pending doom will come, not through the complacent adjustment of the conforming majority, but through the creative maladjustment of a nonconforming minority.

It is sad but fitting that a great American leader, named for the founder of our denomination, can still remind us of the values we preach but often fail to practice.

Will today make a difference?

Video Project to Explore the Effects of Closing Neighborhood Churches

2×2 is embarking on a new project. 2×2 grew from a highly contentious church closing in Philadelphia. In the last two years, we’ve heard many stories of “congregational takeovers” in several denominations. The stories need to be told, but they are not likely to be adequately covered by denominational press. The topic deserves more in-depth consideration than the secular press has carried.

Secular courts have a difficult time crossing the First Amendment Separation of Church and State Clause to truly evaluate church disputes. So be it. That’s America. But the First Amendment guarantees other rights to Americans as well. The press is protected and freedom of speech is protected. There is no reason for these topics to remain hushed or controlled by the denominations any longer. The internet is a medium we can all use. The voices of congregations can be heard.

We are embarking on the creation of video diaries and perhaps a full-scale documentary of how hierarchical decisions impact neighborhoods and the lives of disenfranchised members. We will probe motivations and explore outcomes and look for alternative ways to meet the challenges of small church ministries. We are interested in the stories of congregations that have gone down this road many years ago as well as current closure attempts.

We hope that an honest appraisal will help prompt more compassionate treatment from church hierarchies and solutions to problems that hold neighborhoods and the faith of the laity in the high regard they deserve. If you’d like your voice to be heard, please contact us. Confidentiality, if desired, can be protected.

We are going to start by creating 3-minute videos of individual stories. As we collect data, we will combine the stories into longer footage.

Please contact us via this web site if you know of a congregation willing to share their story. Denominations are welcome to contribute as well.

What to Do with Leftover, Gently Used VBS Materials

The internet served us well this week. A Baylor University student in Waco, Texas, found 2×2 and our interest in reviving Vacation Bible Schools in small congregations.

Virginia Smith served an internship through the Western Kansas Conference of the United Methodist Church. They trained four college students to provide VBS leadership to five congregations last summer. Virginia reported that the smallest group they worked with had about 15 students and the largest had between 50 and 60.

We had a long chat about the VBS-aid concept which 2×2 is promoting and the similarities and differences to the Kansas project.

The experience prompted her to start a web-based service project. She shared her web site with us: vbs247.webs.com

Virginia collects leftover VBS curriculum from any denomination or publisher. She reviews the material to assess the condition for acceptable reuse. She photographs the material and adds the items to her web catalog. Congregations can visit the site and purchase the materials for less than half the original price. The items are priced by condition. Unsuitable items are not sold.

The site does not seek to make a profit. The cost of materials goes toward running the web site and handling the materials.

If you are a small church and think you cannot afford pricey VBS materials, visit Virginia’s web site.

Measuring Church Vitality as Opposed to Viability

We hear a lot about measuring church viability. How depressing! It prompts you to look for flaws to the point that even the evaluators are gasping for breath. When you are concentrating on viability you are always measuring yourself against others. It becomes self-defeating.

But what if you measured vitality instead? We visited a church denominational web site which used this word on very page. It was uplifting. They were measuring all the good things small congregations had going for them — enough to make anyone want to join. There was a definite sense that the denomination valued and cared about their small congregations.

Let’s start measuring the great things small churches have going for them. Great community and committed lay workers may lead the list. Hospitality and inclusiveness are other small church plusses. Small churches are in a unique position to try new things. Go for it! Celebrate who you are and quit trying to emulate bigger congregations.

Here’s a motivational list to help you build your confidence and ministry.

  1. Network! Find other people and organizations who share your values and passions. Some may be religious. Others may be secular. But they are all likely to have positive energy which is contagious. They can be healthy partners to small congregations.
  2. Don’t make decisions based on “but we can’t” rational. Look for what you “can” do. You may be stronger and more capable than you think. Try. Push the envelope. Weigh what is best for you and your ministry. Act boldly.
  3. Find ways to build your congregational confidence. Start small if necessary. If you are too small to support a choir, advertise that you are looking for a trio! If you can’t hold a big event, start with some smaller events. Celebrate each accomplishment.

Remember, God loves you the way you are! There is power in remembering that.

Closing Churches Creates Pariah Parishes

The announcement of church closings is a common scenario in the Roman Catholic Church. Roman Catholic church structure places property ownership in the hands of the bishop.

Not so for Lutherans. Yet in recent years, Lutheran “bishops” are assuming the powers of the Roman Catholic “bishops” and declaring churches closed without the participation of the congregations. As resistance builds, the process becomes uglier and more heavy-handed.

The true measure of a denomination's strength may be how it treats its smallest congregations. Declaring churches closed is asking for trouble. Churches with any life must resist if they are to act on their faith and beliefs — which is what religion is all about.

Once lines are drawn, parishes that resist become pariahs. Gossip starts. No one wants to be involved.

How does a denomination guarantee that determinations of viability are about the parish and not about the denomination?

More congregations will face the mysterious “viability” test. They may not even realize they are being tested.

The signs that this may be happening are

  • no cooperation from the denomination in finding pastoral help
  • pastors sent as caretakers who do nothing to grow the congregation
  • failure to communicate with the congregations (letters unanswered, phone calls not returned)
  • in general, the absence of the denomination until . . . .

Once a congregation is labeled “not viable” word spreads. There is little a congregation can do to change minds. Pastors will disappear and the congregation will find themselves limited to working with lay talents and retired pastors whose careers can no longer be influenced by the denomination.

Any measure of a congregation’s strength made by a denomination, itself in fiscal crisis, must be questioned.

Redeemer is notorious at this point.

One clergy member commented that closing Redeemer doesn’t matter. “There are plenty of churches in that neighborhood.” There were plenty of churches. The Congregational Church on Midvale closed and the building is now the office of a Lutheran Social Service agency. The Methodist Church closed. The Baptist Church closed. The members of St. James the Less were evicted by the diocese. St. Bridget’s is endangered.

The Presbyterian Church faced challenges but has managed to revive their ministry with the support of their denomination. The Episcopal Church, located on a remote street, was assisted by SEPA Synod in creating a ministry plan. Yes, the same synod that determined their own ministry in the heart of East Falls was not viable was assisting the Episcopalian congregation on the fringe of the neighborhood.

At the time Synod declared “synodical administration” on Redeemer, it was the fastest growing church in East Falls.

Decisions are being made about neighborhood ministries by people who know nothing about the neighborhoods.

Money is the issue in East Falls. Redeemer was a small congregation with cash. When Bishop Almquist targeted Redeemer in 1998, we had received a $300,000 endowment a few years prior. We resisted his action successfully, but we became a pariah parish.

In 2007, after nearly a decade of Synod neglect. we still had operating funds and a rented property. The congregation was active and growing. Synod was operating on a recurring six-figure deficit budget. With giving down, the only way out was to look for congregations to close.

Five years after being declared not viable, and more than two years after being physically locked out of their house of worship, Redeemer still meets weekly for worship. Redeemer still develops mission projects which are gaining national interest, if not interest from the denomination. Redeemer remains viable. Imagine what might have been done with the support and respect of church leaders.

One might think that mission and scripture play a role. Love, helping the needy, reconciliation, forgiveness, sacrifice . . . just words when denominations attack their congregations.

Synods must solve their own fiscal problems . . and not on the backs of its small neighborhood churches. The true measure of a denomination’s strength may be how it treats its smallest congregations.  

SEPA member churches, find a voice . . . or you may be next.

Starting Religious Education at an Older Age

The Church has experienced a decade or more of decline. That means that if it is doing its job many new Christians are coming to know religion as adults. They have no experience in Sunday School, Vacation Church School, family tradition, or years as part of a worshiping community.

Teaching “church” to adults can be a challenge. New Christians can have passion but the foundation can be shaky.

One new young adult member was very passionate. Out came the Bible in every meeting venue. He flipped through the Bible with ease and found answers to every question facing the community. He became increasingly frustrated that older members did not respond to his approach. “It’s in the Bible!” Passion grew with frustration. He flipped even faster through the Old Testament and found all the passages revealing a vengeful God. He became more and more critical of other members. Worship became a target. “You need to spend more time on your knees and less time singing,” he declared. The entire church was beginning to walk on eggshells. A member, at last, took him aside and walked him through the worship service. “We start every service on our knees,” he pointed out. He showed him the progression of a typical liturgical service from confession to absolution, to hearing God’s word culminating in the message of God’s love in the New Testament, to our responses of praise, to the prayers for the whole people of God, to the benediction and sending of worshipers into the world to serve. He delivered several hours of catechism in a ten-minute discussion. It may have been too late to satisfy this seeker’s religious needs.

How do congregations, eager for new members, introduce the newly initiated into the complex world of religion? How do we help them grow in faith at a pace that will foster love and service without frustrating them and the community of believers?

“That’s easy,” might be the answer for larger churches. You hold new member training. But smaller churches are getting by with minimal commitment of clergy — often with pastors who do little more than lead worship. If we are to welcome adults into church all churches must consider a plan for initiating new members into church life.

We’ll explore this topic and welcome input from readers.

Evangelism 2012—What Are We Waiting For?

It’s a new year. Opportunity is always staring us in the face, but for some odd reason we have an easier time staring back in the earliest days of the new year.

How is your church going to approach evangelism this year?

There are two methods:

  • Wait for people to come to you
  • Find a way to reach people

The waiting game is always available and used by most churches. You wait for someone to attend a first service or event. This method of evangelism can be effective if you are prepared for visitors and have visitors. It is otherwise useless. Here are some guidelines to maximize waiting for visitors to come to you:

  • Are your members trained to be welcoming? Will they all do their part or will you have designated welcomers?
  • Is your pastor on board with your evangelism efforts? Will the pastor make an effort to greet each visitor and engage in a short conversation?
  • Will your visitor leave knowing the name of someone from the church? Will you know your visitors’ names? Make sure your greeters listen as well as talk. When a visitor leaves you should know something about them!
  • Will someone have the time and responsibility to personally lead your visitors to fellowship or to another person in the church they might like to know?  If they haven’t met the pastor, introduce them. But don’t stop there. (Example: You learn your visitor is a young professional new to the neighborhood. Introduce them to young adults or business people in your congregation.)
  • What events will you invite your visitors to attend? Make sure they do not leave without a specific heartfelt invitation to return.
  • Help them fill out the guest book. Make sure you have a mailing address and before Sunday is over send a card.

The second approach is to find a way to reach others who otherwise will never venture into a church. This approach is necessary if your congregation is not attracting visitors. Here are some thoughts about how to do this:

  • Wear your colors. Help your members open the door to talking about their church. Invest in attractive T-shirts for your young people to wear with pride, so that they have an opportunity to talk about their church. Similarly invest in “campaign buttons.” Create a small pin that adults won’t mind wearing on a business suit or jacket that might prompt conversation. Neither idea is expensive and is giving your members a useful tool.
  • Make your presence known in the community. Use all the tools professional marketers use. Have an active web presence which addresses the lives of the unchurched or the seeking. Use all the social media tools — video, blogging, social networking, etc.
  • Participate in community events. Sign up for the runs and walks and make sure your web site reports and encourages others to follow.
  • Respond to community news immediately. Example: Was there a tragic house fire? Be ready to respond with basket of food, clothing and emergency money for the victims. It doesn’t matter if they are members or not. It’s the right thing to do. People will notice over time that your congregation practices what it preaches.

You can see that this approach is actually creating ministry!