4/7InkzHVUEQeEdU9vpc1tikzEhChrKmPfvXI-FSDBrBQ

Cartoons

The Virtual Church Is Real

…time to figure out what to do with it!

 

The Barna Group published findings of a recent study.

They surveyed senior pastors on their use of the internet and present interesting statistics on the future of the Virtual Church.

 

There is a problem with this survey. It polled pastors. Asking pastors to judge the effectiveness of internet ministry is like asking hunter-gatherers to evaluate farm equipment.shutterstock_183504395

 

One of the first statistics presented in the report points this out.

  • 96% of senior pastors use a computer at church
  • only 39% use that computer to access the internet

 

They are either using the computer as an abacus or they are just so focused on what they are doing that they think they exist in isolation of their communities and the rest of the world.

 

About a year ago, I looked up pastors on LinkedIn, the social media platform used by professionals. I probably was looking for one person and one thing led to another. That’s what happens on the internet!

 

Many were not on LinkedIn. Of those that were listed on LinkedIn, a large percentage had their profiles locked—private.

 

This reveals an interesting attitude. Do pastors not want to be found? Do they not want to witness!?

 

Why did they bother taking the time to sign up at all? Sharing is what LinkedIn and most of the internet is about.

 

Pastors Make Snail-like Progress

The Barna Group report shows that pastors are making progress from their answers to a similar survey in 2000, but the statistics still reveal slow acceptance of the greatest mission tool the world has ever known. Below is a screen shot of the infographic which is part of the referenced post. It is at the bottom of the long infographic and you might miss it. It is very revealing!

 

The Barna Group report is comparing the year 2000 with 2015—fifteen of the most fast-paced years of change in world. The advent of the desktop computer, which started all this, was circa 1985. So, it took 15 years for pastors to reach 35% in their vision for the future. Another 15 years to make another 19%. While the rest of the world is at 100% and moving full-steam ahead!

 

So let’s ponder why the Church faces such challenges today . . . .  Hmmmm?

 

BARNA GROUP image

 

What Would A Survey of Lay Leaders reveal?

I suspect that the statistics would be very different had the survey polled lay leaders.

 

How has the internet changed the lives of parishioners in the last 15 years?

 

A similar poll in most of the workplaces and homes of the people pastors expect to come to church would have 100% acceptance across the board.

 

You can bet we laity use the internet to find answers to biblical and spiritual questions. We are surfing to find resources to help teach Sunday School, etc. We share thoughts, photos, and videos on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram or Pinterest. Our work could be benefiting our congregations! (Several 2×2 readers regularly PIN 2×2 object lessons! Thanks!)

 

The people the Church wants to reach are on the internet every day. The Church, for the most part, is somewhere else, still waiting for people to come to them on Sunday morning.

 

Even congregations with snappy websites are not using their sites for outreach and relationship-fostering—key benefits of online ministry.

 

The 2x2virtualchurch.com Experience

Six years ago, a bishop declared 2×2’s parent church, Redeemer Lutheran in the East Falls neighborhood of Philadelphia, closed. (Lutheran bishops don’t really have that power.) She deemed our congregation of 82 members too small to achieve a missional purpose. Our money and property were confiscated. Pastors fled. But we were not closed. We were locked out. There’s a difference.

 

We took our ministry online. It costs only about $50 a year to have an internet presence! We named our online ministry after the reference to Jesus sending disciples out in teams of two as recorded in Mark 6:7.

 

Truth be told, we didn’t know what we were getting into when we started our congregation’s website. We knew only that our denomination was thinking in the past!

 

Frankly, one reason for 2×2’s success may be that we suddenly had no pastor. We could launch our site without any protocol.

 

Our initial objective was to keep our congregation in touch and grounded in what we knew was our missional purpose.

 

That objective was easily achieved.

 

We soon saw even greater opportunity. We became pioneers in online ministry!

 

Four years into our experiment we are reaching more people each year than we reached in our entire 100 years of neighborhood ministry. Now that’s fulfilling missional purpose! And we feel like we are still just beginning!

 

We learned two things.

  • Vision for tomorrow cannot be measured with tools and measures of the past.
  • Pastors who do not use and understand the internet have no business judging any congregation’s mission.

 

If pastors are not using modern tools, they have no idea what might be possible.

  • They do not realize that they can nurture their members (and the entire community, the world even) every day. They don’t have to wait until Sunday.
  • They may not realize that the Bible is online! It is so easy to find passages with a key word search! And to find commentaries! Everyone with a smartphone has a Bible at their fingertips.
  • They have no idea that their members are finding resources offered by other churches who have embraced new media. If they want to influence members from going astray, they need to be part of the dialogue.
  • They have no idea that an online mission will direct and fuel their mission. Opportunities and needs will find you. The neighborhood will see you in action. They may want to help.
  • They have no idea that their people will be talking about their faith experiences online. If the congregation isn’t there, they cannot be part of the message. (This is especially important if a sharer is unhappy with your church!)
  • They still don’t understand that the few people who are looking to attend church, check a website first. No website. No visit.
  • While they can fret about poor attendance in Sunday School and forums, they fail to realize that they can teach online. People can learn at their convenience.

 

What’s the Holdup?

The holdup is in shaking that old Top-Down thinking. Top-Down thinking assigns important jobs like this to pastors.

 

Most pastors don’t have the skills. This will surely change but it is likely to come slowly. The aging of clergy is one of the challenges of the mainline church today.

 

Lay people have the skills but can’t exercise them without authority.

 

To use the internet well, foundational thinking must change.

 

But this we know: it sure beats waiting to die.

 

2×2 has published many articles on how congregations can use a website to grow mission. Here’s a short list with links, but you can find much more by typing Social Media into the search box.

 

Politics Is Politics—Church or Not

political closure

Signs of the time. Power tempts many to do stupid things.

SEPA’s Mission: Plant It, Water It, Watch It Grow

and then what?

SEPA's Mission Theme

Cartoon: Sunday School 101

Church land grabs

Cartoon: What’s A Settled Pastor?

settledpastorcartoon

Cartoon: Expectations of Modern Christians

Expectations of Modern Christians

The Resilience of Small Congregations

shepherdlrSmall Church Resilience: A Squandered Asset

Today’s Alban Institute blog post addresses church resilience. It includes the thoughts of Judith Jordan who describes resilience as not so much an “intrinsic toughness” but more as an ongoing process of nurturing and fostering of relationships. 

All churches can be resilient. We notice resilience more when the stakes are higher—but both large and small churches can rebound. They can redefine their missions. They can survive.

Resilience grows from love.

That’s what the Church is supposed to be good at. Wealth gets in the way.

The Church at every level is challenged today. Almost all church activity is funded by the contributions of individuals. That quarter that clinks in the offering tray must fund the local church, a regional body, the national church and all church agencies.

It is getting harder for church entities more distant from the members’ pockets to survive. Power is their only tool.

In the Lutheran Church with its interdependent structure, there is very little power assigned to church hierarchy. They are supposed to exist as servants of the congregations. But the economy has hit them hard. They crave more direct access to the wealth of congregations.

They start to stretch their powers, tweaking their constitutions a little here, a little there, until they are wielding powers that were never bestowed upon them in their founding documents.

The sense of mission begins to fade. It becomes replaced with pageantry. Pageantry makes things look better—for a while.

The mission of most churches today is funding their budget.

In this atmosphere it is harder to see resilience. The message of love is lost.

Love breaks down barriers. It opens hearts.

Resilience is hindered in a culture of criticism and judgment. That’s what many congregations experience within the structured church. The list of judgments against small congregations can be long and fabricated. The claims are difficult to prove, but few care as long as they are not personally affected.

  • Lay leaders are too strong.
  • People are resistant to change.
  • People are living in the past.
  • People are unwelcoming.
  • People can’t support clergy.
  • People can’t accept new ideas.

Says who? The people who want to claim church assets.

Funny, the faulty lay people who are “destroying their churches” with their backward thinking are thriving in the secular world which changes more frequently and at a faster rate.

Much of the criticism of congregations reflects denominational needs.

Running a denomination is expensive.  Offices are expensive. Staffing an office is expensive. Keeping up illusions is expensive. The ONLY source of income for denominations is congregational members.

The poor, the needy, the sick, the young and old dependents, the infirm or visionaries need not apply.

Constitutionally, in the ELCA, no congregation is required to give to the denomination. Withholding support for a denomination may be the only voice a congregation has.

But denominations can ignore the voice and interpret the lack of support as the congregation’s failure—never its own.

It should be a huge red flag within a denomination when criticism focuses on lay people to the point of naming them and suing them. Any denomination that puts limitations on the laity’s ability to serve denies the example of Christ, who nurtured a ragtag group of peasants and spent most of his time with the needy.

You don’t hear limiting words from lips of Christ. All that comes later. It echoes through the centuries and may be the undoing of the mainline church.

Both clergy and lay leaders are all capable of leading congregations in renewal. But if their view of a congregation is only a measure of dollar signs for the denomination, then there is real trouble.

Any denomination that seeks to limit any individual’s talents is doing a disservice to their message.

God is love.

Lutheran Fraternal Insurer Seeks to Serve Non-Lutherans

kangaroo2Is there something to be learned from this?

Thrivent, once known as Lutheran Brotherhood, is a financial fraternal association serving the members of all Lutheran denominations.

Redeemer’s Thrivent members recently received a ballot to vote on a proposal to expand their service offerings to other Christian groups.  (They must not have heard that we’ve been kicked out of the Lutheran Church.)

It was inevitable as the Lutheran population dwindles that the financial fraternity would have to expand its economic base and welcome more people into the brotherhood.

This raises some questions about church voting. If an insurance company can open a vote to every member, why do we still rely on representative assemblies voting for us at the Synod level? Might the Digital Age afford us a better way?

Representative voting relies on voters having the knowledge and experience to do a conscientious job. In this regard, the voting procedure within the ELCA is seriously flawed.

The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America adopted a quota system at the time it was formed 25 years ago—before the power of the internet was unsheathed. The original system (faulty as it was) has been tinkered with ever since. Votes are assigned by size of church, gender, language, and age. There is no good way to prove some of these characteristics. Redeemer was a church with a majority membership of color, a strong youth population and multi-lingual. Not only were we never allotted extra representation for any of these demographics, as the bylaws allow, but the bishop (at the last minute) declared us ineligible to send any voting representatives to the 2009 Synod Assembly—which the bylaws do not allow.

None of the voters at that Assembly raised any questions. We’ve been excluded ever since.

Under the quota system, credentials for representatives create a false demographic—an illusion of inclusion. A scan of the floor of a Synod Assembly might make it seem like SEPA Synod is highly diverse. We’ve visited 57 congregations. Diversity is the exception.

Twenty years of liturgical gerrymandering may have resulted in a voting pool that meets inclusion criteria but fails to be representative—or effective.

For example, many congregations have a majority female membership. They must come up with a male if they are to have the proper number of votes at Assembly. The males in the congregation may have no interest and are borderline involved in church government  but genitalia is valued above knowledge and commitment. 

An inexperienced voting assembly is putty in the hands of church leaders. How else can our Synod explain adopting six-figure deficits at a time when giving was down across the board and never stopping to think how those deficits would be overcome and at whose expense?

Voters who don’t understand the issues or consequences of their decisions follow the pack.

There are important documents and procedures which control the powers of the Assemblies and provide safeguards to the congregatons. It’s not just the constitution, with which some people have at least vague familiarity. It includes the Articles of Incorporation, which define the powers of the Assembly and control the extent to which the constitution can be changed. Practically no one is familiar with this document. For one thing it forbids the seizure of congregational property without the consent of the congregation and puts this matter outside the authority of the Synod Assembly.

Without knowledge of church government, Synod Assembly has become a venue to present a synod’s wish list for rubberstamp approval—not a venue for dialog or debate. 

All of this can be revamped for greater participation in an age where this is expected.

It is now entirely possible to allow all members a vote, but failing that they can at least be afforded a voice. It would take some thinking to make it work but it could bring benefits, fresh air, and true representation into the world of Church.

  • Regional offices will be forced to really engage with their constituency.
  • Congregations will have to be realistic about their memberships.
  • They, too, would have reason to engage members on issues that matter.
  • Members would have a sense that their involvement can make a difference.
  • Vested members may increase participation and giving.

Today issues can be presented to all church members online well in advance of the Assembly date. 

During this time, the regional office is free to communicate with all members of the church. Congregations have equal freedom to debate issues. Even individuals can take discussions online. People might actually become involved.

If it is too unwieldy to count each person, a congregation’s representatives can gather after the issues for debate have been aired for a few weeks. A one-day assembly is all that would be needed.

It’s something to think about.

It could be truly transforming!

If insurance companies can count every vote, so can churches.

Voting kangaroos have done enough damage!

Cartoon: State of the Church

State of the Church

The ELCA Makes A Social Statement on Justice


The ELCA examines justice.