4/7InkzHVUEQeEdU9vpc1tikzEhChrKmPfvXI-FSDBrBQ

holy communion

Ambassador Returns to Holy Communion, Philadelphia

One ambassador made a return trip to Lutheran Church of the Holy Communion in Center City, Philadelphia. She was looking for help with our very serious situation in East Falls and the prospect of 11 of our members losing their homes so the Southeastern Pennsylvania Synod can secure the clear title to our church property.

She had attended services in this church for many years and sang in their choir. She was happy to participate in a Baptism but was struck by the few in attendance over all—really not much higher than a service at Redeemer. She enjoyed the solo, “Deep River.”

She was recognized by one member who asked how she was. She responded that she is incredibly sad at the situation in East Falls. She received the answer we hear commonly. “I don’t know anything about that.”

A second typical answer we hear, usually from clergy, is “There is nothing I can do to help.”

This, of course, is nonsense. Clergy are in the best position to raise questions and demand answers. What they mean is “There is nothing I can do to help without it affecting my standing in SEPA Synod and perhaps endangering my congregation in a similar way.” This is sad. It is also enabling!

An article in Holy Communion’s bulletin addresses an upcoming discussion on Lutherans and their historic discomfort with “works righteousness.” There is not much to worry about, if Lutheran leaders are afraid of righteous works!

Our lone Ambassador put two notes in the offering plate—one to Bishop Burkat, who holds membership at Holy Communion, and one to the pastor.

Redeemer has long sought peace, writing a letter a month to Bishop Burkat in 2008, hoping to avert all the problems of the last almost five years. All were ignored while the bishop makes false public claims suggesting she tried to work with us to no avail.

Our hopes are not high that anything has changed, but we are still trying!

photo credit: stevec77 via photopin cc

How Changing Rituals Often Substitutes for Progress

dragging the church to waterWhen churches are really struggling, leaders need to do something.

Leaders are faced with choices. Some choices will be hard work. Some choices will be expensive or chancy. There must be an easier way!

Enhancing a ritual is something that can be done — often by edict — that is a sign that something has happened.

There is an appearance of meaningful change. Sometimes the only change is that the church leader, usually the pastor, has bragging rights—something to list in the annual report.

Church rites are often the target of faux progressive initiatives.

The changes may be accompanied by a series of sermons on why the changes are being made. There may be good reasoning and sound theology, but there was probably already good theology behind a congregation’s traditions.

Holy Communion is often the instrument of such reform.

Church leaders can boast of progress when all they are doing is the same thing—more or less often or in a fancier or plainer way.

The tacit reasoning may be that it is hard or distasteful for people to argue about something so sacred.

True, many people will avoid unpleasantness in the church. If they feel their traditions are being unfairly violated, many will suffer in silence or simply stop coming. It’s called voting with your feet. Today’s church has a very large voting bloc by this definition.

People feel manipulated. “Have we been wrong all this time?”

When such changes are brought about by some form of strong-arming, it would be wise to measure results. This is rarely done! Even if it were, reversing a decision may be too embarrassing.

Before venturing change in heartfelt traditions ask a question: Will this change have the desired spiritual impact and enhance the overall mission of the congregation?

If the answer is no, find an activity that does make a difference.

It will probably be more work.

photo credit: maistora via photo pin cc