4/7InkzHVUEQeEdU9vpc1tikzEhChrKmPfvXI-FSDBrBQ

worship

Repurposing the $1000-Sermon

pew copyPreaching Past the Pews

Think about what goes into the staging and delivery of the weekly sermon.

  • Divide your pastoral salaries by 52 and then divide by five. That’s what you paid your professional leaders for the week’s sermon.
  • Then add the costs of maintaining a building.
  • Add heat and air conditioning costs.
  • Now add the costs of the other professionals who help set the stage for delivery of the service—the sexton, organist, and choir director.
  • Add the cost of the church secretary and the cost of printing the bulletin.
  • We won’t add the costs of the many volunteers, but they added to the experience, too.

These costs and efforts are repeated every week. The beneficiaries—the people in the pew—are likely to be the same people every week. They number between 15 at the low end and 700 or so at the high end. The median congregation is probably less than 75 per church.
Advertisers call this calculation the cost per impression. Church costs per impression are very high indeed.

Oddly, this is never seen as squandering resources. Why not?

Because it defines Church. This is what churches have done for 2000 years.

We are well into the 21st century. The internet has been around for about a quarter century. It gets more powerful every day. It also gets easier to use. We are capable of so much more than monks with their parchment and pen.

The same message delivered in your church on Sunday can and should be preached beyond the back pew. This does not mean printing the sermon on the web site. This will attract practically no readers—except perhaps other preachers looking for ideas!

Put the Same Information Into Different Formats
Reach Far More People

There are ways that a sermon delivered to very few (even in well-attended churches) can reach into the neighborhood. Done consistently it is likely to attract people to your ministry.

We could take any sermon as an illustration. We’ll take for example the sermon that our Ambassadors heard last week at Trinity, Norristown. It’s fresh in our experience. Like most people, we don’t remember sermons very long.

The source scripture for the day was the story of the Apostle Philip’s encounter with the Ethiopian eunuch. The eunuch was sitting in his chariot, minding his own business, trying to make sense of the book of Isaiah. Along comes Philip, who might have passed up the opportunity to share, except that he was following orders from God. Soon the two were chatting about Jesus.

The sermon was delivered by one of Trinity’s three pastors, the Rev. Dr. Asha George-Guiser.

The gist of the sermon was the “blasting of barriers.” She pointed out that Philip and the eunuch could not have been more different, yet both were able to come together and talk about scripture.

Dr. George-Guiser focused her entire sermon on just one illustration—her marriage. She is of Indian descent, tracing her Christian roots to the evangelistic efforts of the Apostle Thomas, father of the church in India. Her husband of many years is also a pastor of Trinity. He comes from a non-religious Pennsylvania farm family and is racially White.

Dr. George-Guiser talked about how difficult it was for her family to accept her marriage. Their many differences were barriers that took years to blast away. Blasting away at the barriers led to a long and happy union.

Great illustration. It probably resonated with the congregation of about 70, many of whom probably know both pastors very well.

The service was at 11 am. By noon, the sanctuary was empty. The message and sermon were already on their way to oblivion to await the message of next Sunday. The shelf life of a sermon is very short.

How could the same sermon be repurposed to reach many who were not present in church last Sunday?

  • What if earlier in the week, the congregation had been invited on a church blog or Facebook to identify barriers in their lives? Anyone taking part in that conversation would be more invested in the worship service.
  • What if illustrations of barriers in the community had been identified and addressed on the blog? People who might never set foot in a sanctuary but who discovered the blog because of their community interest would see a church in action. The church web site would find more and more readers.
  • What if photos of barriers in the neighborhood had been posted on Pinterest with a link back to a discussion on the church blog? The congregation would have even more exposure in the community.
  • What if a few memorable snippets from the sermon were recorded as a podcast? Commuters might listen during the week as they drove to work.
  • What if a Powerpont with key sermon ideas had been posted on SlideShare? Other churches might share it.
  • What if the same Powerpoint were used in worship to illustrate the sermon? They were using projection for every other part of the service. It might extend the short life of the average sermon.
  • What if a children’s version had been posted on a kid’s corner on the web site?

The possibilities are many.

It’s more work to be sure, but suddenly that $1000 investment in a weekly sermon is going much farther.

Your church can go from talking about “blasting barriers” to actually lighting a fuse!

Do you see why having a communications expert is just as important to today’s church as an organist or a choir director? They can help maximize your investment spreading the Good News. It changes everyone’s job description a bit, but if transformation is to occur, something’s got to give!

Warning! The effectiveness of a church communications plan fashioned to reach beyond the pew is a marathon. If you want to give it a try, plan to dedicate a year minimum to begin to see results. By year three it should be reaping benefits you’d never imagine going without!

photo credit: kern.justin via photopin cc

Are Sermons Passé?

storybookIs the weekly Sunday sermon
reaching anyone anymore?

When my son was little, he created a little ritual. He’d pick out a stack of storybooks for bedtime reading. Ten or so was the usual number and we usually went through all of them. But I did not dare start a story without saying certain words.

“Say it, Mom. You have to say the words.”

The first time he demanded this, I had no idea what he was expecting.

He patiently prompted me.

And so I took orders from my tot.

I opened the book to the title page and said. “And now it is time for our featured presentation.”

He was, obviously, influenced by his video and movie experience. A story just wasn’t a story without this little bit of fanfare.

Beyond “Once Upon A Time”

Modern culture does influence us. It affects our point of view, our attention span, and are ability to process information that we hear. When we set about listening, we have different expectations than our ancestors may have had. We recognized this when we moved from the two-hour sermon to the one-hour sermon to today’s 20-minute expectation. But today, things are still changing.

I have written many times about the futility of paying a pastor a salary with one of the primary objectives having a 20-minute sermon written for just fifty people once a week.

That’s a lot of resources invested in something that half of the listeners are likely day-dreaming through. At the end of the service, we never really know whether or not we have reached anyone with the Word. But we keep at it because that’s the way the Word was delivered for hundreds of years—since farmers and tradespeople took a break from the isolation of their fields and shops and gathered with the whole village to spend the day.

I know that I may be beating a dying horse with my arguments. Dying is probably the right word. Just look at the statistics. We are watching the steady decline in attendance in most mainline churches. If you think the 30 to 50% drop of the last 15 years is alarming, be prepared. The biggest decline is in people under 40. The next 20 years are going to be really bad for a lot of congregations. There is no one to fill the roles of today’s 50-, 60-, and 70-year olds. It is unlikely that the younger generations will ever adapt to the traditional delivery of a sermon.

Understand I’m not against preaching. It’s been our family business for generations. I’m questioning whether the ritual format of worship, including the sermon as the weekly featured presentation, is achieving its purpose—any purpose.

Consider the Lowly Podcast

Podcasts are voice only online presentations. They can be easily promoted on a  blog or web site and delivered to listeners through itunes. One of their major benefits is longevity. They can be accessed long, long after they are posted and certainly long after the Sunday morning church service ends. They can be shared. Your audience can grow!

Podcasts are the fastest growing platform for social media.

Why?

People can listen to them when and where they want. It doesn’t have to be at 10:20 on Sunday morning in the sanctuary on Main Street in every zip code. They can listen while they ride the bus, do the dishes, or mow the yard. They can return to a section they liked or questioned. They can listen to their favorite podcaster (preacher) or follow any links he or she might give to other inspirational or insightful resources.

They fit into our modern way of life as Christians and seekers.

At Redeemer, without a sanctuary for our people to attend and since our pastors headed for the hills long ago, I connected our members to an online teacher. (We are determined to stay true to our mission despite our unjust expulsion from the ELCA.)

Every day our members receive a short email Bible lesson. Only recently have I started to get feedback. They like it. At our last Redeemer gathering they started talking about the week’s lesson, which happened to be the book of Philippians — the foundational scripture for 2×2’s publication, Undercover Bishop.

My next experiment may be to expand this feature and develop podcast commentaries. Or maybe we can record chapters of Undercover Bishop!

It may begin as early as this week. Watch for it!

Podcasts may be the wave of the future for preaching. Who knows? We don’t have to give up the Sunday morning sermon, but after a while, we may want to!

And now it is time for our featured presentation.

photo credit: Travis Seitler via photopin cc

Worship in the Modern World

Serving a New and Talented World

I’ve had the opportunity to attend many youth concerts in the last few years. I’ve noticed a remarkable difference from my school experiences.

Today’s young people have the ability to excel in skills beyond what was possible for all but the most motivated among those of us who were schooled 40-50 years ago.

They have constant exposure to the professional talent. We had the Mickey Mouse Club and the Ed Sullivan Show.

They have teaching tools that were unavailable to us as we learned to play our instruments. Online teachers are plentiful. There is a device that can play recorded music slowly without changing the pitch. How I remember replacing the needle on the high-fi, guessing that it was falling at the phrase I wanted to learn and trying to keep up with the pros as I practiced!

Suffice to say . . . the coming generations are better at many skills at an earlier age than we dreamed of being. The contestant age requirement on some TV singing competitions has dropped to 12. Twelve! The 12-year-olds are holding their own. The quality is there. Sometimes their lack of maturity causes them to falter, but several have made it through to the final rounds. The recent winner of The Voice is just 16.

Most of our talented young community members are not in church.

Could our style of worship be influencing apathy?

As much as we like to think of the worship experience as corporate and engaging, it really isn’t — not when measured against the potential.

Those who grew up in the church and have an understanding of what is going on in a worship service may take comfort in knowing the rationale behind the various sections of the liturgy and understand how it intends to engage them.

But these are fewer and fewer. As a result, worship becomes more and more passive. We exist in a world where our ability to express ourselves is exploding with potential.  Yet in worship we are asked to behave as spectators. Today’s spectators have higher expectations!

For the last three years, Redeemer worshipers have been forced into a spectator role, denied access to our own sanctuary. In our own worship, we would all be involved. But that happens only on the first Sundays of the month now. Nevertheless, we take seriously our role as spectators, participating in the limited ways allowed as guests in worship.

We notice that the worshiping body is more and more passive. The larger the congregation, the more passive. Some even pay select choir members!

Congregations often seem to be content to be overpowered by an organ. The roles of worshipers are orchestrated. One will read scripture. Another will take the offering. Tradition.

Spontaneous expression is almost non-existent with the occasional exception of prayer— notably in the churches with more of an African or African-American membership.

In 65 visits, we have seen no dance (common in Redeemer worship). Choirs are fairly rare.

There was always something interesting and spontaneous happening in Redeemer’s worship. A nod from a worship leader was enough to let a worshiper know that they would be leading the next part of worship.

It was not unusual for a member to climb the sanctuary stairs on Sunday morning and say, “I’d like to sing a solo this morning.”

Sometimes it was embarrassing, but human. One week, (has to be six years ago) someone stepped forward to sing a solo as prelude. Her choice ended up to be the opening hymn. What are the odds of that! So she sang. And then we sang. It was memorable. The hymn was “We Have Come Into His House.” Do you remember what the opening hymn was in your worship last week?

As an observer, I wonder if the structure of the worship service might need an overhaul to allow for the growing talents and expectations of our community members. We inherited our worship from a time when one or two educated members of the community led mostly illiterate worshipers. The abilities and skill levels of the modern worshiper make us much less likely to be content as spectators. The modern worshiper may not understand that when they are asked to stand, sit or read the words that are printed in the bulletin in boldface — well, that’s involvement!

We have a tendency to substitute ritual and call it engagement. Are we really engaged when we all file to front of the church and hold hands out for communion?

There is a huge challenge in wondering about all this. We are not expected to ask such questions.

The Church As A Captured Audience

cowBe A Good Christian! Just Make Nice! 

Every afternoon, shortly after 4 pm, I get a series of phone calls. I know the callers well.

There are Matt and Brian. They are cheerful fellows who represent home security companies. There are Rachel from Verizon and Debbie who is sure my carpets need cleaning.

  • I’ve tried simply explaining that I have no interest in what they are offering.
  • I’ve tried asking them to not call again.
  • Now I just hang up.

They’ve given themselves permission to annoy me with their message which is about their needs — not mine. They do this because they can. Technology makes it possible.

A few minutes ago, my computer started talking to me. Someone had found another way to intrude.

I will never buy a home security system from Matt or Brian. I try to remember the advertisers who abuse their relationships with me.

So how does this relate to life in the church? How do our worship services intrude on worshipers and their relationship with God?

We tend to make assumptions. After all, the congregation is a captive audience. Our presence at worship can be seen as permission for anything church leaders wish to do with us.

  • I’ve heard pastors force agreement from their congregation. “Let  all the people say …” They wait for an “Amen.” It’s just a like a pep rally. If the response isn’t strong enough, they try again. “Let  all the people say . . ” “AMEN.”
  • I’ve seen pastors approach people who have chosen to not participate in communion and try to force a blessing on them.
  • I’ve attended worship to hear five minutes of ads from the lectern or pulpit before prayer.
  • I’ve been invited to prayer by pastors who came to our congregation with clear intent to do harm.
  • I’ve been passed the Peace of God from people who brought enmity to our doors.

I was in church. I was expected to Make Nice.

It’s part of modern society to assume that what we want from people is so important that we have a right to pursue it in any setting. All we need is the ability to force our way into their thinking.

Church has one major goal: to bring people into relationship with God and his people. The relationship with God is most important. If we put the needs of the community first, with all our pet agendas, we risk intruding on relationships that we should be fostering, not milking.

We should not treat worshipers as if they are part of a captive audience. We don’t know what brought them to our door. We should make an effort to find out! Recognize that they are individuals at varying places in their faith journeys. They may not be ready to agree  or support our ideas. They may not be ready to pray with us. They may be truly questioning what they hear. They may be angry or hurting and looking to make sense of things with God. Their presence is not an invitation to sell them on the next Potluck Dinner.

It’s church. We are supposed to accept whatever comes down the road and make nice—no matter what. Compliance spreads throughout church life.

One pastor once said to one of our Ambassadors, “Why don’t you people just move on?” In other words, “Hand over everything you own to us, allow us to lock you out of your faith community, don’t care, don’t stand up for what you believe, and do as you are told.”

Faith actually requires independent thinking—not group think. When we foster group think we are not fostering faith.

NO is often the right answer.

It’s hard for the worshiper to hang up on someone making an unreasonable request in the Church. It’s easier to stay home.

How do we foster independent thinking in the corporate community?

photo credit: Old Shoe Woman via photopin cc

Adult Object Lesson: Advent 4

swing

With A Song in Your Heart — SING!

Luke 1:39-55

Today’s object lesson is a song. Today we ask our adults to remember a time gone by when we didn’t listen to music on itunes, or the radio or on TV every minute of day. Think back to the day when our songs were in our minds and not planted in our subconscious by professionals—back to the day when we owned our own music—one of a kind—probably never repeated—no copyright needed.

That may predate your congregation.

Ask them if they can remember their childhoods or watching their children or grandchildren blissfully swinging and singing a song of their own invention with each pump of their gangly legs.

Today, it is rare that songs spring from our hearts. The Bible has many notable outbursts of song. Miriam sang when the Israelites were delivered from their Egyptian captors. David sang — often.

It was a different age. They sang without a thought of ratings!

In today’s scripture, Mary sings a beautiful heartfelt song. Ask your congregation to close their eyes as you read the words of the Magnificat from the Bible.

Have them open their eyes and sing the Canticle of the Turning together.

Experience the power of song.

Incidentally, recent research indicates that humans are wired to communicate in song. Early evidence indicates that all cultures may respond to music in very similar ways.

(This came up in our Twitter feed — or we wouldn’t know this to share with you!)

Song is powerful.

Today is a day to remember that we all have a song inside of us. We don’t have to wait for a professional to fine tune it and make it marketable to the masses. Just sing it. God is listening.

PS: (If you really need an object, start the talk with an iphone in your hand, adjusting your earphones as you turn to your congregation.)

photo credit: rubyblossom. via photopin cc

As We Approach Christmas Eve

Facing a New and Talented World

I’ve had the opportunity to attend many youth concerts in the last few years. I’ve noticed a remarkable difference from my own school experiences.

Today’s young people have the ability to excel in skills beyond what was possible for all but the most motivated among those of us who were schooled 40-50 years ago.

They have constant exposure to the professional talent. We had the Mickey Mouse Club and the Ed Sullivan Show.

They have teaching tools that were unavailable to us as we learned to play our instruments. Online teachers are plentiful. There is a device that can play recorded music slowly without changing the pitch. How I remember replacing the needle on the high-fi, guessing that it was falling at the phrase I wanted to learn and trying to keep up with the pros as I practiced!  I’d have died for one of them.

Suffice to say . . . the coming generations are better at many skills at an earlier age than we dreamed of being. The contestant age requirement on some of TVs singing competitions has dropped to 12. Twelve! The 12-year-olds are holding their own. The quality is there. Sometimes their lack of maturity causes them to falter, but several have made it through to the final rounds.

How does this speak to the church?

As much as we like to think of the worship experience as corporate and engaging, it really isn’t — not when measured against the potential.

Those who grew up in the church and have an understanding of what is going on in a worship service may take comfort in knowing the rationale behind the various sections of the liturgy and understand how it intends to engage them.

But these are fewer and fewer. As a result, worship becomes more and more passive. We exist in a world where our ability to express ourselves is exploding with potential.  Yet in worship we are asked to behave as spectators. As spectators we have higher expectations!

For the last three years, Redeemer worshipers have been forced into a spectator role, denied access to our own sanctuary. In our own worship, we would all be involved. But that happens only on the first Sundays of the month now. Nevertheless, we take seriously our role as spectators, participating in the limited ways allowed as guests in worship.

We notice that the worshiping body is more and more passive. The larger the congregation, the more passive. Some even pay select choir members!

Congregational singing is generally weak, with many congregations content to be overpowered by an organ. The roles of worshipers are orchestrated. One will read scripture. Another will take the offering. Tradition.

Spontaneous expression is almost non-existent with the occasional exception of prayer, notably in the churches with more of an African or African-American membership.

In 52 visits, we have seen no dance (common in Redeemer worship). Choirs are fairly rare.

I miss Redeemer worship. There was always something interesting and spontaneous happening. I miss playing my wooden flute. I carried it with me and often played during hymns, just sitting in the pew. I haven’t been able to do that for years now. We haven’t seen that type of spontaneity in any worship setting we’ve visited.

A nod from a worship leader was enough to let a worshiper know that they would be leading the next part of worship. I can’t recall anyone balking.

Sometimes it was embarrassing, but human. One week, (has to be five years ago) someone stepped forward to sing a solo. Her choice ended up to be the opening hymn. What are the odds of that! So she sang it. And then we sang it. It was memorable. The hymn was “We Have Come Into His House.” Do you remember what the opening hymn was in your worship last week?

As an observer, I wonder if the structure of the worship service, which was created at a time when one or two educated members of the community directed the illiterate masses, might need an overhaul to allow for the growing talents and expectations of our community members. Their abilities make them much less likely to be content as spectators at worship and many don’t have the tradition of knowing that when they are asked to stand or sit or read the words that are printed in the bulletin in boldface — well, that’s involvement!

We have a tendency to substitute ritual and call it engagement. Are we really engaged when we all  file to front of the church and hold hands out for communion?

There is a huge challenge in wondering about all this.

Most of our talented young community members are not in church.

When you attend Christmas Eve worship in your unlocked church next Monday, think what might be possible if the Church didn’t do things the same way week after week.

Until then, once or twice a year, when the Church is putting its best foot forward, might be enough for most people. Click to tweet.

Worship As Entry into Church Life

All Welcome! Are they really?The sign hangs close to the door of almost every church. ALL WELCOME.

A similar message of welcome will be on the church’s opening web page, usually accompanied by a photo of Christmas Eve worship—as if Christmas worship is representative of the whole church year.

We still expect our worship experience to be the entry point into community life within the Church. There may have been a day when this was true.

That day would have been when most people had some familiarity with religion and sought a new church community only when they relocated.

Today, however, a first-time visitor is often entering our doors totally unprepared for what they are about to experience.

Their first impression will be as if they were watching a foreign film with subtitles in a different foreign language.

  • Liturgies and hymns are laced with words from Latin and Greek and tunes from ancient choral traditions.
  • They will be asked to stand, sit and kneel with little explanation as to why. Obvious perhaps to church goers, but not to today’s visitors.
  • They will juggle bulletins with papers flying out and hymnals that have two numbering systems.

And then comes Communion, where they won’t be sure if they are among those welcome or not. They may be unsure of the local customs and have no clue what this eating and drinking of the body and blood of Christ is all about. (Many of those participating don’t know either.)

There is nothing wrong with any of this. Just realize that it doesn’t necessarily communicate to visitors. Although meant to be welcoming, it may be alienating or worse.

If a visitor is not welcome at communion, their first visit to church has been an experience of exclusion.

If communion is a weekly event, they will feel excluded weekly until they are made welcome through some form of initiation. If the Eucharist is a third of the worship service, the visitor has been excluded from a third of the worship service.

This is just something for the Church in a new age to think about as we practice our rituals.

photo credit: 12th St David (taking a breather) via photopin cc

Why Worship in America Is Only for the Rich

Most people who attend church never stop to think of what the average Sunday morning costs. Many put a dollar or two in the offering plate — satisfied they’ve done their part. If they thought about it at all, they would probably compare their offering to the cost of a movie ticket. It’s about the same amount of time invested, and there are no expensive movie stars, stunt men or cars to blow up!

Here’s what a typical Sunday morning church experience costs (actual costs will vary):

  • First there is the cost of having a sanctuary. Let’s assume that an annual property budget includes at least $20,000 for keeping up the church building. That’s roughly $55 for the day.
  • Air-conditioning in summer and heat in the winter probably cost about $50 for the day. It all depends on the size of the sanctuary and type of heat.
  • Hospitality facilities must be included. Let’s add $50 per Sunday. That will cover the kitchen, coffee and paper supplies.
  • Then there’s the organ. Those organ maintenance contracts can knock the organist’s socks off— about $40 a week, whether or not you turn the power on.
  • We’ll assume the hymnals and choir music were purchased a long time ago and we never have to invest in new music.
  • The bulletins, probably cost $2 each with paper and toner and copier maintenance. If we have 100 at worship, that’s $200.
  • Now we come to the really expensive part—the minister. We won’t count the day spent planning the service and writing a sermon. A supply pastor costs roughly $150 for a one-hour service. A called pastor costs more. At a modest annual salary of $40,000, the Sunday part of the salary costs $109. But we have to pay for the whole week.
  • Office help to put the bulletin together might cost $30, but we are betting the office help wants to be paid for a few other days a week as well.
  • The organist, let’s say $150.
  • The choir director, another $150.
  • The janitor who keeps the place clean and the side-walk shoveled in winter — let’s say $25.
  • We’ll assume somebody donated the flowers for the altar, and the wine and bread for Communion.
  • Thank God for the volunteer choir, readers, ushers, nursery help. etc. We’d be out of business without them.
  • We won’t add the cost of using multimedia. We’ll just stay behind the times.

So let’s add that up.

Our barebones church service, handled the way most churches handle a service costs $900.

The worship service costs about the same whether we have 50 at worship or 500. Only the bulletins and hospitality costs slide with size.

If we have 100 people in church, every one of them — man, woman and that cute baby — must put $9 in the offering plate.

And they are paying only for Sunday morning.

We have to collect that every day to pay for the other six days of the week. How many of your church members are putting $63 in the offering plate every week? That’s $252 for a family of four every week! Let’s hope no one skips a week!

This is just the cost of Sunday morning worship. Our sample church hasn’t begun to reach out, educate, provide social services or support a hierarchy yet.

This is just something to think about as we plan ministry.

Praising God should not be prohibitively expensive for any size church. The cost is making worship the province of large churches. Large church worship is of a different nature than small church worship and doesn’t appeal to many. Most people belong to small churches. When it becomes too expensive they are not likely to start going to large churches. They are likely to become unchurched. Perhaps this is part of mainline church decline.

How can we make praising God something everyone can afford?

Any ideas?

The Beauty and Creativity of Small Church Worship

Our Ambassadors have visited 43 churches in the last 18 months or so. We’ve been to large churches and small. We’ve heard 15-member choirs with paid section leaders and small churches with small choirs and solo musicians.

The worship experience isn’t fashioned to compete, but our Ambassadors can’t help but observe. There is a big difference in the worship experience in a church with more than 50 in attendance and the many smaller churches we visit.

We have found some of the most creative and enriching worship experiences in congregations with less than 30 in attendance. Our last two visits were prime examples.

Tabernacle Lutheran Church in West Philadelphia has a great pianist who led a breadth of musical selections throughout a two-hour service. He was in sync with the pastor and the choir and shifted seamlessly from liturgy to Gospel music and hymns to anthems with additional meditative offerings. Except for the quality of his work, you might not be aware of his presence, it so complemented the worship experience. A third of the worshiping body was robed and singing in the choir. The congregation was actively involved, often singing along with the choir. Members of the congregation rose to offer lengthy prayer petitions. The service was an expression of the people in every way.

St. John’s in Ambler also had a wealth of music throughout the service, led by a small combo of flute, piano/cello, organ and a cantor. Sections of the liturgy were sewn together by musical interludes that were frequent and beautiful, diverse and appropriate. Worship was not rushed but evolved at a pace that the entire congregation seemed to find comfortable. By the end of the service, half the congregation had taken part in worship leadership.

In several small churches, lay members even filled the pulpit. At. St. Mark’s, Conshohocken, a school teacher read her own meditation. At. St. Michael’s, Kensington, a lay leader read a sermon prepared by the pastor but delivered with her own passion. She deftly addressed the children in a hands-on children’s sermon.

In our experience, congregational singing excelled in smaller churches. In larger churches, the collective voice of the people was often drowned out by organ power. (Organs were installed and designed with full sanctuaries in mind — rarely the case today!)

Larger churches often featured the standard three/four hymns and an anthem with appreciative congregations that were comfortable with a structure that asked little of them.

Why does the small church worship experience often stand out?

Small numbers may make it necessary for churches to nurture skills that might be hidden in larger churches, where paid talent makes the worship choices.

The small church worship experience is owned by the congregation. The members of small churches are accustomed to stepping forward to provide leadership. Such initiative might be impossible in large congregations.

This is a joy of small church ministry. Everyone can grow. The experience is the responsibility of the people. The result is spiritual growth. There is growth in other ways, too. The congregation becomes tolerant of the imperfect, forgiving of miscues, and encouraging to the early efforts of the timid. Worshipers begin to recognize their fellow worshipers in a broader dimension, experiencing their offerings of expression.

Perhaps, what the Church needs is more SMALL churches and a way to better plan to make their good work known!

photo credit: bass_nroll via photopin cc

A Special Easter, Ascension or Pentecost Service

The 14 Stations of the Risen Lord

The Roman Catholic tradition has long featured the Stations of the Cross. They are part of Catholic architecture.

Five or six years ago, we found photos online of a church with windows that depicted the 14 Stations of the Risen Lord, an interesting variation on the Stations tradition. If memory serves, the church is in Washington State, but a search online today did not help us find the photo references.

At that time, we researched some material to create a service of scripture, meditation, prayer and song which follows the 14 Stations of the Risen Lord. We regret that any references we used at the time were not recorded.

But we thought small churches might enjoy this variation for special observances of the Easter, Ascension or Pentecost seasons.

The attached PDF is prepared in printer’s spreads, which means the pages are in position to be printed and folded into a booklet. They are, however, numbered, so you can follow the Stations by number.

All the stations are biblical except one. The windows depict the Risen Christ appearing to his mother, Mary. The Bible does not record this, but scholars have long debated its likelihood.

Please feel free to choose your own hymns and prayers or even to add your own meditations. This is presented as an idea for small churches to adapt for creative worship.

We will be glad to add attributions, if they are found. Just drop us a comment, please.

photo credit: Lawrence OP via photopin cc