4/7InkzHVUEQeEdU9vpc1tikzEhChrKmPfvXI-FSDBrBQ

Judith Gotwald

We Still Call Ourselves Lutherans

There are only so many church properties SEPA can seize to pay hierarchical costs.As Redeemer Ambassadors visit churches of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, we are often asked where we are from. After three years, the question is still a kick in the gut.

SEPA/ELCA rejected us four years ago. It did more than reject us. It confiscated our property and pursued members in court — an ongoing travesty that countless good Lutherans handle by looking the other way. (The message of the Good Samaritan story has been lost in translation.)

ELCA founding documents, the foundation of Lutheran law, forbid the confiscation of congregational property. Courts have decided they can’t uphold church law. They have no jurisdiction.

Two dissenting state Appeal Court judges wrote an opinion that if the law were followed, the members of Redeemer were making arguments that should be heard.

This should raise eyebrows among Lutherans.  

East Falls Lutherans are left with a difficult choice. The hierarchical assumption (if not wish) is that members would seamlessly uproot their lives, traditions, and personal relationships and travel to other Lutheran churches on Sunday morning with their offerings. Suing church members makes this scenario unlikely. Which congregation wants the targets of SEPA litigation as members?

Other ELCA churches have failed to lift a finger. Many of them are no stronger than Redeemer—cowering as they await their turn at rejection. The less they do now, the more likely that day is coming.

There are lessons to be learned by the Church about how to treat church members. They are not unlike the lessons business and government are learning in the modern world. Power has shifted.

The Church, living in its own lawless bubble, may be the last to grasp this. People, in the post-feudal church at least, have long controlled the purse strings. Now they control communication as well.

The shift in power is a good thing. We should be rejoicing. People can make a difference! The whole Church can make a bigger difference — but only if the concept is understood and put to use.

When SEPA Synod visited East Falls with faux concern for the neighborhood back in March, Redeemer was there. Did Rev. Davenport realize that 10% of the audience that day had connections to Redeemer? She was oblivious. SEPA doesn’t realize that members don’t evaporate just because you lock doors. We still live here. We still participate in neighborhood government and patronize neighborhood businesses.

There are only so many church properties SEPA can seize to pay hierarchical bills before they will have to come up with a better survival tactic. Now is a good time to start looking!

What should the Church do with loyal members when they dare to challenge actions?

Just practice what is preached!

What would be happening today inside Redeemer if members had been treated as children of God and not as enemies that must be vanquished at any cost?

A better way is still possible. Sooner or later a Good Samaritan will pass by.

Meanwhile, Redeemer members visit the congregations who have rejected us and answer with pride, “We are from Redeemer Lutheran Church in East Falls.”

We are still Lutherans—and proud of it!

Object Lesson for Adults: August 12, 2012

1 Kings 19:4-8, Psalm 34:1-8, Ephesians 4:25-5:2, John 6:35, 41-51

This week’s object is a potato chip (or perhaps a peanut).

Eat one yourself and start to take another. Stop yourself.

If your group is small, you might put some chips or peanuts in a bowl and pass them around the congregation with the admonition that they eat just one and stop, just as you did.

Play off the well known advertising tagline (Lays), “Betcha can’t eat just one.”

Compare this human craving for more of a good thing to what was happening along the Sea of Galilee in the last few Gospel lessons.

It started with the miraculous feeding of the multitude with five loaves and two fish.

The similarities to a key story of the crowd’s heritage is not lost. The people were familiar with God sending miraculous food supplies in various Old Testament stories. In the most memorable, God sent manna from heaven in adequate, if not abundant, supply and saved them from starvation.

That they had just witnessed a similar miracle had the impact of a gold rush. Jesus, the man who had grown up near them in Nazareth, could feed them for the rest of their lives! Who would have thought!?

The frantic fans followed Jesus along the shore line, hopping into boats — any way to stay close to the miracle worker. Following Jesus could change their lives forever. “Count me in!” they might have been crying.

Jesus had their attention and he knew it. Now was the time to introduce a new concept.

He continued to teach more than preach.

Aha! You like the bread I gave you. What’s that? You want more! Try this idea on for size. “I am the Bread of Life.”

Jesus stretches the minds of his new fan club. They can have a piece of the Bread of Life.

It was not clear what Jesus meant. It is debated even today. But one thing is clear: To participate any further in this miracle, they must make a connection with the Father if they want the sustenance of the Bread of Life.

Look down at the bowl of chips or nuts. Ask: Are you ready for some more? What are you willing to do?

How Hierarchies Are Putting the Church Out of Business

Hierarchies start with the best of intentions.

  • Centralize authority to ensure quality and efficiency. Call it leadership.
  • Pool resources for cost effectiveness. Call it stewardship.

This has worked only short-term. In the long run, it has been disastrous and self-destructive.

The Church has been in the hierarchy game for a very long time. The Old Testament dallies in a number of systems—patriarchy, slavery, judiciary, military, monarchy—each with strengths for the moment, each going awry to be dealt with by a powerful, vengeful (but still loving) God.

The New Testament, puts all of this aside and forges a new relationship between God and His people, centered not on wrath but on love.

As Christianity spread, scattered faith communities sought unified leadership. The keys handed to the fisherman who set out with a walking stick and the shirt on his back were soon held by those with well-appointed robes and massive treasuries. The only way to keep the coffers full was to exert power.

The trappings of power created the illusion of necessity. Necessity became entrenched. If anyone noticed that the system was leading nowhere, they were dealt with swiftly.

The well-intended system stopped working a long time ago. It took centuries for Reformation to attempt to do something about it. Its success was limited and its message seems to be forgotten.

That’s the way with hierarchies.

Today, every person wields tremendous power. A teenager holding a smart phone controls more resources than worldwide television networks had twenty years ago.

When church members in the pew realize this, there will be a new Reformation. The only delay in this happening is the long tradition of lay people doing little but following and the innate desire of God-loving people for peace and pleasantry.

There are still many (if far fewer) satisfied followers sitting in the pews. Knowledgeable, motivated leaders among them are beginning to realize that their considerable efforts to gather resources to support the hierarchies isn’t good stewardship after all. They are growing weary of struggling for resources that do nothing for their communities but maintain a building and support a requisite hierarchically named pastor. They are looking for new supporters, but the lines of people looking for controlling relationships with its own system of taxation is very short.

For the time being the hierarchies are licking their chops as they glean the last kernel of corn from the field before they give up their ways—all the while preaching that the problems of the Church are that congregations won’t change.

Hierarchies don’t really want change.

But change cannot be avoided.

There are fewer churches and fewer Christians. Same old hierarchies.

photo credit: K e v i n via photo pin cc (retouched)

How Many People Heard Your Sermon This Morning?

In dozens of churches near Philadelphia and hundreds or even thousands of churches across the country, hard-working pastors stood before their congregations this morning and delivered sermons to fewer than 50 people.

A conscientious pastor probably worked for days on that sermon. He or she probably spent the same amount of time on his or her sermon as far fewer pastors who delivered sermons to larger congregations.

Preaching is a major investment for every congregation whether they have 50 members or 1000 members—probably half the annual church budget.

Yet churches resist using the tools the modern era provides to preach the gospel to every corner of the world.

2×2, the web site that grew from Redeemer Lutheran Church’s exclusion from the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, began with little experience with the internet. We had only a static web site which we rarely updated — just like the vast majority of churches who are concentrating on paying a pastor.

2x2virtualchurch.com became our new site.

2×2 studied the medium and followed recommended practices. We had no money to invest in outside help, so we learned how to do this ourselves.

Perhaps we were the perfect candidates for this evangelism frontier. We discovered that a small church can swim with the big fish!

Here is a mid-year report from the congregation SEPA Synod claims doesn’t exist (because they say so).

  • Every DAY 106 followers read our messages with our posts delivered to their email addresses. Huge potential for growth here!
  • Every WEEK an additional 250 or more come to our web site for information.
  • Every MONTH more than 1000 new readers find our site.
  • We’ve had 7000 visits this YEAR (in addition to our daily readers) and are on track to double that by the end of the year.

(Editorial update-Jan 16, 2013): All of these numbers have doubled since this was published five months ago!)

2×2 started strong in the Middle Atlantic states and California. In recent months our readership in Southern states is spiking. We’ve had readers in every state and regular readers in a dozen countries. Six congregations write to us weekly and share their ministry challenges and successes.

Topics which draw readers to 2×2 are (in order of popularity)

  • Object Lessons for Adults
  • Social Media
  • Small Congregation Ministry
  • Broader Church Issues
  • Vacation Bible School

We’ve learned that it is impossible to predict the popularity of a post. We had a Whoville theme party last January and the post about that still attracts search engine traffic several times each week. A post about a visit to a small church in a Philadelphia suburb and its pastor’s “brown bag” sermons for adults began attracting new readers daily, which led us to develop object lesson sermons.

Several seminaries have sent students to 2×2 for discussion topics.

2×2 has established both a mission voice and reach that rivals or surpasses mid-sized churches. We’ve done it on a shoestring budget. Another year to 18 months will no doubt add to our reach.

We will continue our experiment in modern evangelism.

How many people heard the sermon your church paid for this morning?

photo credit: Photomatt28 via photo pin cc

Involving Laity in Planning Church Worship

Who Should Plan Worship?

The fallback thinking is that pastors or organists plan worship.

Let’s look at worship planning from the small congregation’s point of view.

If a congregation can afford only part-time pastoral help and they allocate a good bit of that expense to sermon preparation and worship planning, they are paying for church maintenance, not church growth. For small churches, this may be a waste of resources.

Here is a bit of news. Anyone can plan worship. 

Lay people attend hundreds of worship services, but they don’t think about leading them.

The food is placed before us and we eat. If we like the food, we come back for more. If we don’t, we become less involved.

This common scenario detracts from worship. Over time and among a people who are less and less educated in church, people fail to realize the purpose of worship.

Worship is about praising God—not satisfying worshipers. Nevertheless, if worshipers are organically involved in the planning, God will be glorified by a joyful worshiping community.

Many denominations have an established structure that facilitates worship planning.

Liturgical churches usually follow a lectionary, which means that scriptures and themes of weekly worship are already laid out following the traditional church year that begins in Advent and ends after Pentecost. The previous link takes you to the lectionary on line. If you want to have a reference book for your lay leaders, here’s a link for a print version of the Common Lectionary.

This is how pastors plan worship. (Anyone can do this).

  • They read the lessons and then review the structure of the worship service.
  • They find hymns which augment the theme. Sometimes this is all that happens.
  • Going beyond that, worship planners can look at the language of the liturgy: the confession, prayers and responses. There are resources which provide pre-written changes in wording and ideas for novel expression. There is no law against writing your own. (We recommend Sundays and Seasons. This link is for the current year which is nearly over. The first Sunday in Advent (December 2) will be here before you know it! Here is the link to plan for 2012-2013 using Sundays and Seasons.)

As long as worship planning is the province of paid professionals, this is what will happen week after week.

Stop and consider the talents of the worshiping community. How can they add to the worship experience. Do you have school teachers who can tell a children’s story? Do you have dancers, musicians, writers and artists? Are there banner makers and printers? Are members involved in social service ventures that need to be embraced by your community?

When lay people become involved in worship planning, there will be answers to these questions.

People will  come to understand what is going on in a worship service and how it relates to the full mission of the church. As they become involved, they grow in realizing that they can lead. New leadership skills will transfer to other arenas of congregational life.

The hardest part is getting started. Ask for help. Be prepared to teach as you get started. See what happens! 

photo credit: dtcchc via photo pin cc (retouched)

Making Choices in the Church

There is new jargon in the world of parenting. When our children stray from the path we would hope they follow, we scold them for “making poor choices.”

Not “wrong” choices. “Poor” choices. That’s less judgmental.

Making choices is a big responsibility. It is something we are asked to do regularly in the Church.

  • We can choose to attend worship . . . or not.
  • We can choose to support the work of the Church with our offerings . . . or not.
  • We can choose to help . . . or not.
  • We can choose to stand up for an unpopular cause . . . or not.
  • We can choose to speak out for the oppressed . . . or not.

Children make choices. Parents make choices. Congregations and leaders make choices. Pastors make choices. Bishops make choices.

  • The Church can choose to invest in social change.
  • The Church can choose to be more welcoming.
  • The Church can choose to tolerate differences.
  • The Church can choose to give a voice to those who differ.
  • The Church can choose to resolve conflict.
  • The Church can choose to love, forgive and reconcile.
    Or not.

Sometimes the Church makes good choices. More often we make the choices that are less troublesome and require the least effort.

Sometimes the choices we make are more than poor. They are wrong.

That’s where the Church chooses to fail.

photo credit: Dr Case via photo pin cc (retouched)

Social Statements As Ritual

In a previous post, we noted how the Church, when struggling, turns to adjusting a rite or ritual to create an illusion of accomplishment.

The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America has a ritual that exists outside of worship. It is called the Social Statement.

Social Statements, Messages and Resolutions

Social Statements are treatises explaining the official position of the Church on topics of concern to both the Church and secular society. They are designed to facilitate discussion in hopes that congregations address issues on their own but in keeping with the teachings of the Church.

Lutherans value individual belief and diversity, so the Statements, for the considerable work put into them, carry no real weight.

The ELCA has been in existence since 1988. It has issued 11 Social Statements. Topics include: abortion, Church in Society, the death penalty, economic life, education, the environment, genetics, health and healthcare, peace, culture and sexuality.

For situations requiring more expediency, the ELCA Church Council adopts Social Messages. In the past 23 years, they have addressed 12 issues.

Carrying less weight is a third level of statement: Social Policy Resolutions. There are tons of these sitting on the ELCA website.

Drafting Social Statements in the Digital Age

The process of drafting Social Statements began before the full power of the internet was realized. Individuals are named to a commission that creates a draft document. Discussions are held at the regional level with the commission drafting the final document to be voted on by the Churchwide Assembly.

It is now possible to have ongoing debates without scheduling geographic meetings with their limitations.

Discussion could take place regionally or on the denomination’s magazine site. This site is open to all by subscription only, which limits its effect as a forum and evangelical tool. The internet eliminates logistical restraints but the Church creates new ones!  

The documents, even in draft form are available on the web. It would be interesting to know the statistics of how many times these documents are downloaded, shared, tweeted, etc. This could only increase readership and effectiveness and should be easy to do. Comments should not only be allowed, they should be encouraged. Without interaction, they sit on the national church website gathering cyberdust.

The Current Effort

The ELCA is currently developing a statement on Criminal Justice for consideration in 2013. The Church’s view on this topic should be interesting as it has exempted itself from the laws its members are expected to follow. When challenged, it cries “Separation of Church and State” but does not hesitate to use the courts to force its will on congregations as evidenced in the Southeastern Pennsylvania Synod and its treatment of the members of Redeemer congregation. On this issue, where the church is a lead player, there has been no room for diversity. Members have been denied voice and vote by decree. Open discussion is discouraged.

The Church addresses issues with minimal impact. There is the illusion of caring and involvement.

Now what? Work done?

The History of Evangelism: A Pictorial Primer

Lesson 4

Object Lesson for Adults: August 5, 2012

Trust

Exodus 16:2-4, 9-15  •  Psalm 78:23-29  •  Ephesians 4:1-16  •  John 6:24-35

Your object is an umbrella. As you begin to preach your object lesson. Open the umbrella. You might sit down and pause for a moment with the open umbrella. You might walk around the sanctuary a bit with the umbrella.

If you live in an area experiencing drought, engage members of the congregation in talk about the weather and how it is affecting them. Are they complaining? Are they praying for rain?

Point out that if they are praying for rain and they trust God, they ought to be carrying an umbrella wherever they go.

The umbrella, in this case, is the symbol of trust.

God WILL provide. It is our job to trust and accept His help!

Point to the Old Testament lesson for the day — the story of how God provided his discontented people with manna in the morning and quail in the evening.

There is more to this story, some of it told in Numbers, chapter 11. The full narrative includes the account of God’s anger and Moses’ angry exasperation with the people he is trying to lead. Getting people to trust God isn’t easy!

But the lesson today is about God providing faithfully for his people, even when they don’t seem to deserve it.

That may be enough for today’s object lesson.

There is more to the lessons for the day. Jesus relies on common knowledge of this story, refreshed by his recent miraculous feeding of the multitude with bread and fish, and extending the metaphor to his own purpose on earth. He is the Bread of Life.

He is playing with them a bit in his teaching style just as you are playing with the congregation in walking about with an umbrella in church.

People are no different today than in Moses’s or Jesus’ time. We want assurance that our physical needs will be met. You’ll pray for many of them later in the service.

Do we truly trust that God will answer our prayers?

Silently put your umbrella away.

photo credit: solidether via photo pin cc

How Changing Rituals Often Substitutes for Progress

dragging the church to waterWhen churches are really struggling, leaders need to do something.

Leaders are faced with choices. Some choices will be hard work. Some choices will be expensive or chancy. There must be an easier way!

Enhancing a ritual is something that can be done — often by edict — that is a sign that something has happened.

There is an appearance of meaningful change. Sometimes the only change is that the church leader, usually the pastor, has bragging rights—something to list in the annual report.

Church rites are often the target of faux progressive initiatives.

The changes may be accompanied by a series of sermons on why the changes are being made. There may be good reasoning and sound theology, but there was probably already good theology behind a congregation’s traditions.

Holy Communion is often the instrument of such reform.

Church leaders can boast of progress when all they are doing is the same thing—more or less often or in a fancier or plainer way.

The tacit reasoning may be that it is hard or distasteful for people to argue about something so sacred.

True, many people will avoid unpleasantness in the church. If they feel their traditions are being unfairly violated, many will suffer in silence or simply stop coming. It’s called voting with your feet. Today’s church has a very large voting bloc by this definition.

People feel manipulated. “Have we been wrong all this time?”

When such changes are brought about by some form of strong-arming, it would be wise to measure results. This is rarely done! Even if it were, reversing a decision may be too embarrassing.

Before venturing change in heartfelt traditions ask a question: Will this change have the desired spiritual impact and enhance the overall mission of the congregation?

If the answer is no, find an activity that does make a difference.

It will probably be more work.

photo credit: maistora via photo pin cc